Social amnesia jacoby5/15/2023 L’article conclut avec une exposition brève de la notion du narcissisme bénin de Fromm, de son contenu spécifique aux conditions de sa possibilité. À cet égard, d’attention est donnée à la fois à la populace et aux élites gouvernantes. Le point d’attention puis se déplace à l’approche du Fromm sur le concept Freudien du narcissisme, avant de procéder à explorer en quelque détail son explication des mécanismes symboliques et du climat contextuel qui doivent combiner en réalité afin que les énergies narcissiques soient acheminées au autoritarisme et à la violence. L’analyse est d’abord située dans le débat méthodologique sur les opérations analytiques requises pour une compréhension adéquate de la violence autoritaire, en expliquant pourquoi une perspective psychanalytique est nécessaire. Cet article offre une évaluation bien disposée de la conceptualisation du narcissisme selon Erich Fromm et du rapport de cette notion à l’émergence, la nourriture et la résolution de la violence autoritaire. The article concludes with a short exposition of Fromm’s notion of benign narcissism, from its specific content to the conditions of its possibility. Attention in this regard is paid both to the populace and governing elites. The focus then shifts to Fromm’s take on the Freudian concept of narcissism, before proceeding to explore in some depth his account of the symbolic mechanisms and contextual climate that must combine in practice in order for narcissistic energies to be channeled into authoritarianism and violence. The discussion is first placed within the methodological debate over the analytic operations that are required for an adequate understanding of authoritarian violence, explaining why a psychoanalytic perspective is necessary. This article offers a sympathetic appraisal of Erich Fromm’s conceptualisation of narcissism as it relates to the emergence, sustenance, and resolution of authoritarian violence. Indeed, Fromm’s analytic operations and foci combine to offer a firm rebuttal to Bourdieu’s curiously ahistorical contention that psychoanalysis concerns itself exclusively with the individual and always in line with some version of psychologistic determinism, thereby serving as an apologia for the abuses subjects suffer under the established order. Substantively, moreover, Bourdieu tends to exclude physically violent forms of domination from his account of the material effects of symbolic constructs, whilst Fromm consistently places them centre stage. As far as method is concerned, whereas Bourdieu focuses attention on the socio-political processes of production and reproduction of the perceptive structures that individuals and groups employ in their judgements and actions, Fromm fruitfully extends wider to include the links between perceptive and socio-political structures, on the one hand, and the innate structures of the human psyche, on the other hand. To this end, Frommian psychoanalysis is compared with the ‘socio-analysis’ of Pierre Bourdieu. Russell Jacoby defines social amnesia as society's repression of remembrance - society's own past Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.This article aims to make a case and set the foundations for retrieving Erich Fromm’s Freudo-Marxist theory of action and his approach to social domination in particular. Social Amnesia contains a forceful argument for 'thinking against the grain-an endeavor that remains as urgent as ever.' It is an important work for sociologists, psychologists, and psychoanalysts. He discusses how in the years since Social Amnesia was first published society has oscillated from extreme subjectivism to extreme objectivism, which feed off each other and constitute two forms of social amnesia: a forgetting of the past and a pseudo-historical consciousness. In his probing, self-critical new introduction, Jacoby maintains that any serious appraisal of psychology or sociology, or any discipline, must seek to separate the political from the theoretical. Jacoby' s new self-evaluation has the same sharp edge as the book itself, offering special insights into the evolution of psychological theory during the past two decades. It is simultaneously a critique of present practices and theories in psychology. Social Amnesia is an effort to remember what is perpetually lost under the pressure of society. In this book, Jacoby excavates the critical and historical concepts that have fallen prey to the dynamic of a society that strips them both of their historical and critical content. Russell Jacoby defines social amnesia as society' s repression of remembrance-society' s own past.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |